Friday, November 4, 2011

HP And the 7 S Disaster

As a long-time fan of Palm, I recently watched the train wreck that was HP's acquisition of Palm Inc. Palm, boasting a strong brand and product but lacking the financial might and executive leadership to take on heavyweights Apple and Google in the mobile space, decided the put themselves up for sale as a last ditch effort to avoid from getting completely knocked out of the ring.

HP, thinking that they would love to get into the mobile space themselves, saw an opportunity to buy their way in by acquiring Palm and essentially slapping an HP logo on the back of the Palms products. While this all seemed like a great idea for both companies, it is apparent that the executive leadership of both Palm and HP failed to remember the importance of the 7S model that they should have learned in their strategy class in college.

By throwing the people from Palm in the HP world, the 7S model became totally misaligned. Perhaps the two biggest misalignments invovled structure, and style.

HP is notorious for their quirky "cube culture". When it comes to style, HP and Palm couldn't have been more different. Palm, led by former Apple executive Jon Rubenstien, had adopted Apples style of creativity and focus on product development. Palm had long earned a reputation as a thought leader and creative product innovator. HP, on the other hand, specializes more in acquiring innovation from others and re-branding. When the two came together, something had to give. As a result, many of the Palm executives jumped ship.

As mentioned earlier, the strategies of the two companies were very different, Palm's strategy had been to continuously lead the market in innovation, while HP's strategy has long been to invest in other people's innovation and sit back and reap the rewards. When HP bought Palm, they tried to deviate from their own tried and true strategy and found out that things get tough when you leave your comfort zone.

As a result of the misaligned style and strategy of these two companies, the acquisition of Palm by HP was an epic failure. It took almost a year for HP to even put a product to market and once it did, it completely pulled the blog a few weeks later. The Palm brand is completely dead, the talent that HP acquired has nearly all left for other jobs, and now HP can't even sell off the Palm division that only a year ago they spent billions of dollars for.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Google: The Columbus of Profit Pools

I was reading and article about Google+ today. While I was reading, I couldn't help but think about our discussion and reading about profit pools. Perhaps no other company has done a better job at seeking non-traditional profit pools in their industry than Google. In so many spaces, Google has invaded various markets with entrenched competitors, such as Microsoft, and challenge them using different profit pools as points of leverage. For example, Google decided it was going to get into the mobile operating system market. Instead of charging OEM's to license the software, they started giving it away for free intending to make money off the increase in use of some of their ad-supported services on the web. This has been incredibly effective and has dramatically changed the landscapes of nearly every industry that Google has jumped into.

Friday, September 16, 2011

Apple and the Value of a Brand

I read a headline the other day titled "Apple Drops 'Jew or Not Jew' App From Store". This immediately reminded me of our in-class discussion we had about the power and value of brands. Perhaps no other company had fully exploited the power of brands more than Apple. Apple's brand is so valuable that people often refer to the higher price of Apple products as the "Apple Tax". Apple's recent decision to exclude an application that allows people to search a database of famous people to determine if they are Jewish or not, is a maneuver aimed at protecting their brand. Similar to earlier decisions that banned pornographic materials from their app store, Apple has a brand and image that they are a company of high values, and they are more than willing to act to maintain that image and brand.